Picking up where we left off w/ psalms last week ..
PSALM 38
This one is called “Prayer of an Afflicted Sinner” and as
you might guess, it sure is bleak. OK, there is a tradition of bleak
psalms. In them, the psalmist cries out
to the Lord to ease his burdens, to give him hope and salvation. The psalmist is turning to the Lord because
he has no one else to turn to. He’s at
the end of his rope and only the Lord can help him out.
It’s a powerful theme and these are generally among the most
vivid and visceral of psalms. This
time, however, there’s a little wrinkle.
You see, normally the psalmists burdens are caused by his enemies. Normally, the Lord is his only friend.
But here? The Lord
is the cause of his misfortune. Wait,
no – hold that a second. The Lord isn’t
literally the cause – the sinner’s sinning is the cause. But he fells the Lord is angry at him and
turned away from him – and that’s why he is suffering so much.
The language here makes it sound like the psalmist
contracted VD. Maybe not, but you have
to admit, it’s a legitimate interpretation of lines like, “My loins burn with
fever; there is no wholesomeness in my flesh.”
At the very end it chickens out a bit. Now he’s blaming his enemies for his
misfortunes, but it reads like the stanza from a different psalm was stuck on
this one. That said, what’s really different
about this psalm is the lack of a happy ending. He gets no resolution – he just suffers and prays to God to be
redeemed.
PSALM 39
This one has one of the best starts of any psalm I’ve read
so far. The psalmist starts by pledging
to bide his tongue and stay silent and muzzle his mouth and .. and .. and – he just can’t do it! “In my sighing, a fire blazes up, and I
break into speech.” Yeah, that gives
this guy some credibility. He sounds
like someone who is going to just lay it out there and tell some untold (and
perhaps unpleasant) truths – because they have to be said. Also, it’s a nice narrative effect. It sucks us in and makes us wonder what will
happen next.
What happens next is a fairly standard psalm. It’s not bad, but it’s the opening lines
that stick in the memory.
PSALM 40
I can see this psalm being popular with Christians. It fits their imagery pretty well. Actually, it seems to flatly go against
ancient Hebrew beliefs, as the psalmist (again, allegedly David) says,
“Sacrifice and offering you do not want; you opened my ears. Holocaust and sin-offering you do not
request.” Well, the Torah makes very clear he does request that and the Israeli
priests did sacrifices until the Roman Empire.
So this fits more in with Christianity, which never went for that.
Aside from that, it’s a standard psalm about how the
psalmist takes comfort and aide in God.
Again, I can see why the faithful like psalms such as this, as it can
provide solace when they are blue. It has some nice imagery, too, as God:
“Draws me up from the pit of destruction, out of the muddy clay, Sets my feet
upon rock, steadies my steps.” Yeah,
good job by the psalmist with those lines.
The second stanza begins with a bleak start as the psalmist
notes that evil surrounds him, his sins overtake him – but of course it’s all
about building up to the happy ending where the Lords helps him out. Here is how it ends: “Though I am afflicted
and poor, my Lord keeps me in mind. You
are my help and deliverer; my God, do not delay!” I like the bit of ambiguity
there. Sure he has faith, but he also
has doubts and flaws – and he needs God to hurry up already so his pros will
overcome his cons. The exclamation
point sure is a nice touch.
PSLAM 41
This reads like two different psalms stuck together oddly as
one. The first stanza is praise for
helping the poor, and how those that do so will be repaid by the Lord. The rest of the poem has nothing to do with
that, though. The rest is standard
“Lord, help me versus my accursed enemies” stuff. (Actually, it reminded me of “Positively Fourth Street” by Bob
Dylan as the psalmist recounted how people speak to him without sincerity and
gossip behind his back).
How do you reconcile these two halves? My answer – though this is yet another psalm
supposedly written by David, it’s a poor, obscure man and the psalm was later
attributed to David. Yes, I know David
began life as a shepherd, but this reads more like someone who lives all life
at a lowly rung. Since he’s lowly and
people are treating him bad, he begins his poem by saying how wonderful those
are who help the poor. It’s harder to
reconcile the first stanza with the rest if it’s written by the king of all
Israel.
PSALM 42
This begins Book 2 of psalms. Pretty much everything in Book 1 was attributed to David, but
these early ones in Book 2 aren’t. Why
multiple books? It’s due to printing
technology. Back then, you didn’t have
books, but scrolls. And the most words
you could fit on a scroll is essentially the Book of Isaiah. Well, psalms are a lot longer than that, so
I assume it must’ve been on multiple scrolls.
Therefore, I guess Psalm 42 was the first one on the second scroll.
Really, they could’ve chopped up psalms into multiple modern books of the
Bible, but obviously they didn’t see the point in doing that.
OK, lesson in psalms aside, this is one of the bleaker
psalms. Sure, there is still plenty of
talk about how wonderful God is and how he’s the inspiration, but the main
theme here is a sense of lacking. This
psalmist wants a closer relationship with God, but isn’t feeling it. This deep yearning is causing him
problems. He feels downcast. The psalm ends with him still feeling every
bit as blue as at the beginning, but affirming that God will help him. Eventually.
I can see the appeal of this psalm to the faithful. Everyone has doubts. Everyone has their moments of crisis. And everyone has moments where they feel
low. Part of the appeal of religion is
that it can give comfort, knowing that there is this higher power out there
that you can turn to for help. But,
sense you always have doubts, what if you feel cut off from that higher
power? Then where can you turn to? Well, then you turn to Psalm 42 and realize
that even in the Bible people feel the same way you do.
No wonder Psalms are among the more popular parts of the
Bible. This is a far more personal
book, one which helps people get over their dark moods and get past their
crises in their faith and personal life.
The psalms themselves can help people persevere.
This also explains why I don’t get as much out of it. I ain’t a believer, so it’s just a purely academic exercise for me, not a personal or spiritual one.
PSALM 43
This is a short psalm – just five verses – that covers much
of the same ground as the previous one. The psalmist is sad because while he
believes in God, he feels God is spurning him.
His soul is downcast and groans within him, but he still has hopes God
will help him eventually.
Hey wait a second – both Psalm 42 and Psalm 43 have the
exact same end line! (looks
further). Actually, the last two lines
are the same, word-for-word: “Why are you downcast, my soul, why do you groan
within me? Wait for God, for I shall
again praise him, my savior and my God.”
Well, clearly these psalms are by the same author going
through a personal crisis. In fact, I
have wonder if they were originally meant to be just one poem, with a common
refrain.
PSALM 44
This is a weird psalm in that it combines two themes that
aren’t typically combined. First, there
is a sense of longing, a feeling of being abandoned by God. You get that often – like in the psalms
immediately before this one. Aye, but
this isn’t a peaceful psalm. Not at
all. Instead, the second theme here is
blood and guts. It’s not nearly as
violent as Psalm 18, but the psalm longs for the days when, well, when God
would kill all his enemies.
The first stanza fondly recalls how God, “rooted out nations
to plant them, crushed peoples and expelled them.” Ah, the Good Old Days.
But now those days are gone, and the Hebrew are forced to retreat. Their enemies advance, and they feel
completely rejected.
It’s interesting, because we think of God as being so much
vaster and above things than the old fashioned pagan gods of the ancient Near
East. In those places, a city or empire
would have a god it prayed to for help and victory in war. Their gods were more like local patron
saints than what we’d now think of as god.
But here? God is every bit as
parochial as any run of the mill Near East deity. He just happens to be the all-powerful God (though I’m sure the
Philistines and others felt that about their gods, too). The Hebrew prays to him because he can give
them glory and success in war. The
Hebrew take on gods began out of the Near East context, they just broadened him
to make him THE God, not just their god.
But here, he’s still just their god.
What’s interesting is how the third stanza makes clear that
the Hebrew don’t deserve this. The
psalmist clearly states that they’ve kept their covenant and not forgotten him
– yet they’ve been forgotten anyway.
That’s not normally how Jewish theology works. The Babylonian Captivity was explained as punishment for their
transgressions, not punishment despite a lack of transgressions.
Also, there are some nice lines here. In discussing their misfortunes, the
psalmist psalms: “You make us a byword among nations.” Bummer.
They’re the Cliff Clavin of the ancient Near East. Later on, he writes: “For you we are slain
al the day long, considered only as sheep to be slaughtered.” Sheep to be slaughtered – that’s a line with
a future in front of it.
PSALM 45
This one is called a Song for a Royal Wedding, and it’s not
quite what I expected. It’s not really
about a wedding. The first half is
apparently for the king: “You are the most handsome of men,” it says. Gee, buttering the monarch up, I see. But it talks about success in battle and how
God is on his side. And how God also
loves justice. Really, though, I’m a
bit confused if the pronouns refer to the king or God.
The second half is advice for the woman getting
married. The main advice is to, “Forget
your people and your father’s house.”
You belong to your husband now. This is quite a bit more than just
changing last names back then.
PSALM 46
This is a fairly standard psalm in praise of God. It’s pretty much all about God, rather than
the psalmist’s relationship to him, and as such I don’t have too much to say
about it.
Well, with one notable exception, that is. Some of the imagery is rather striking. In fact, it reminded me of a movie – a movie
about the Lord’s tabernacle, in fact.
Yup, this psalm is a nice accompaniment for Raiders of the Lost
Ark.
Just check out these lines: “Though nations rage and
kingdoms totter, he utters his voice and the earth melts.” Hey – in Raiders a guy melted when the
Tabernacle was opened up! Later it
says, “Who stops wars to the ends of the earth, breaks the bow, splinters the
spear, and burns the shields with fire: `Be still and know that I am
God!’” That’s a nice Big Time line to
end on. That said, burning with fire
and destroying everything that comes in his path – yup, that still sounds like
Raiders of the Lost Ark.
EDITED to add: here is the next batch of psalms
I've been enjoying reading through this as I'm reading through the Bible right now myself.
ReplyDeleteDo you know about the "hidden message" in the KJV of Psalm 46? If you count 46 words from the beginning you get the word "shake" and 46 words from the end gives you "spear" and as the KJV was published in 1611, Shakespeare would have been around 46 when the KJV was written. Some have believed that Shakespeare helped with the translation and hid his name in the Psalm.
Probably just coincidence but William Shakespeare is an anagram of "Here was I, like a Psalm."
Dustin - that's interesting. Probably a coincidence. That said, King James had the best writers of the day write the KJV, and Shakespeare was around for it. But even if he translated/wrote parts of it, that might just be a coincidence.
ReplyDelete