Monday, September 2, 2013

Samuel I: Chapters 12 to 16

Last time, there was the rise of Saul.  Now things get more complicated.


CHAPTER 12

This is a pretty slight chapter, which does little but rehash points previously made.  The main thrust is to make the reader think Samuel is awesome.  It begins with a recounting of Samuel’s integrity. Despite all his many years as a judge, no one could recall any time he’d ever taken a bribe or engaged in any corruption, or wronged anyone.  He’s a good judge, got it?

Now we go from praise of the last judge to all the arguments for why having a king is bad.  We already heard them, but now we hear them again.  Short version: Israel choosing a king means Israel is rejecting God.  I’m not buying it, though.  This is what the priests think, in part because it puffs up their position.  And these words are coming from Samuel, who is a priest and judge.  Samuel says that if they don’t listen to the voice of the Lord, he’ll turn against them and their king and they will “understand how great an evil it is in the eyes of the Lord that you have asked for a king.”

Hold in, the above statement by Samuel makes it sound like going away from the Lord while you have a king is a sign that having kings is a bad thing.  OK, but if that’s true then wouldn’t it also be true that going away from the ways of the Lord under judges is a sign that judges are a bad thing? Well guess what – we just saw tons of examples of that in the Book of Judges.  We saw some extreme examples of that in the time of Moses even.  So what makes having a king any different? 

This reads purely like a power play by Samuel.  He’s the one being pushed aside, and he’s responding like an angry old crank.  Don’t get me wrong.  I’m sure in his mind this isn’t just a power play but upholding the will of the Lord.  But his mind has melded the two together – his position and will of the Lord.  After all, he’s been making decisions in the name of the Lord for quite a long time.

Something is mentioned at the end of this chapter that I think highlights a fundamental paradox of the religion of the ancient Hebrew.  We’re told that God will not abandon his people since “the Lord has decided to make you his people.”  Yeah, the notion of being the Lord’s people strikes me as a paradox.  The Lord is supposed to be almighty; the creator of all.  Well, if he’s the creator of all, why is he just have on people he looks after?  The relationship between God and the Hebrew makes more sense if he’s just one God of many – even if he’s the most powerful of the one God among many.  That’s probably how this religion began, and then it took new turns and forms.  Christianity really does strike me as an outgrowth of the ancient Hebrew religion. 

CHAPTER 13

The chapter has a weird start.  The first line is designed to tell us how old Saul was when he became king and how long he reigned.  Only, apparently the text left his age blank and then claims he ruled for two years, which can’t possibly be true.  (My Bible lists at as “-two years” indicating that they think its 22 or 32 or 42.  A footnote says in the New Testament, St. Paul says Saul ruled for 40 years, so I guess its 42).  At any rate, it’s a paperwork error, right there in the Bible. 

Moving on, the chapter discusses a fight between Saul’s forces and the Philistines.  They’re meeting for battle, but they’ve got to wait for Samuel. He’s supposed to wait on Day X to issue a burnt offering, and only then can they fight.  Only Samuel is late.  Saul, worried that his forces will slip away (they are already trembling, the Bible reports, and remember this is the guy who had some Israelis refuse to support him when he first became king).  So Saul figures we can’t wait forever for Samuel, and he does the burnt offering himself.

Naturally, once he does that Samuel shows up.  Naturally, Samuel hits the roof.  You should’ve waited!  You’re out of line!  It’s the priest’s job!  How dare you violate the Lord’s commandments!  All that. 

Me?  I’m totally on Team Saul for this one.  Samuel comes off like the classic short-minded boss, one who knows what his role is and wants everything to revolve around it.  He has a completely parochial point of view.  What’s best for Israel is following the Lord’s ways and that means going through the priest.  The priest is the only one who matters here.  Saul points this out – look, I waited, but you were late.  And the troops were melting away, and the Philistines were right there.  What was I supposed to do?  The Bible’s slant is fully on Team Samuel (it is, after all, called the Book of Samuel), but Samuel is being completely impractical here.  If it meant that much to him he shoulda, I dunno, showed up on time!  He’s a small minded man, bitter over the loss of power to the king (we’ve already seen repeatedly his view that Israel picking a king equals Israel turning away from God).  Now he’s doing whatever little power play he can.  Anything that doesn’t go his way is an excuse for mass histrionics. 

Actually, you know what Samuel reminds me of?  I suck on the terminology here, but during the days of Christ, there were a few main sects of Israeli. (looks it up).  Sadducees – that’s it. I think.  Well, for purposes of this paragraph that's the right group.  They were the group during the time of Christ that who claimed power based on their status as priests and the roles that obligated them to do.  And they’d use this position against others.  They knew the laws, but not the feeling.  It was all just following procedure, and without much element of grace or human feelings.  I think that’s their reputation anyway.  Yeah, that’s Samuel.  Oh, he doesn’t say that the religion should be all about Samuel.  He can say it’s all about judges or priests or God’s law, and since he’s a prophet he can say he’s got God’s ear – but his slant on the religion happens to, wouldn’t you know it, put a primacy on Samuel and mean that those possible rivals to him are terrible.

At any rate, the Philistine invasion goes well, which is as Samuel foretold.  In Samuel’s mind, it’s because Saul didn’t wait for him.  In my mind, when your judge/priest/prophet so completely upbraids the king on the eve of a big battle over ticky-tack stuff – that can’t be good.  Hell, I get the feeling that deep down Samuel feels glad the Philistine opening thrust went well. It vindicates him.  And Samuel seems to care more about himself than anything else.

You know who else Samuel reminds me of?  Bobby Knight.  Bobby Knight was a great coach who followed the rules.  His kids went to class, they graduated, there were no NCAA scandals. But he was a self-centered jackass.  That’s the prophet Samuel.

CHAPTER 14

Now the big battle chapter.  Jonathan goes off with his armor bearer – and on the great list of Bible characters who don’t get named, the armor bearer deserves special mention.  He’s up with Abraham’s servant who arranged Isaac’s marriage, the daughter of Jephthah who was sacrificed by her father, and the nameless man who warned Eli earlier in Judges. 

Well, Jonathan and the armor bearer turn a bad situation into a victorious one.  Jonathan attacks a group of Philistines and  kills 20 (he takes them down and the armor bearer finishes them off).  And then the Bible takes a turn for the unbelievable.  We’re told that killing these 20 guys causes confusion and panic to break out in the Philistine camp.  They freak out and before you know it, they’re stabbing each other with swords in their camp. 

Oh come on.  A Hollywood studio would reject that script.  Can you imagine: now in scene one, Rambo kills 20 guys, and in the rest of the film the opposing army falls apart. If the Philistine army were really worth half a damn, it wouldn’t fall apart that easily. 

At any rate, Saul has everyone take an oath not to eat anything until they’ve finished the battle.  Everyone hears it and upholds it – except Jonathan.  He’d slunk off with the armor bearer without telling anyone, and so was out of contact when the oath happens.  So Jonathan breaks the oath by eating a bit of honey.  (We’re also told some soldiers ate animals with blood still in it – not kosher – but Saul atoned for that ASAP).  Saul finds out who did it and promises to kill whoever is responsible, even if it’s his firstborn son Jonathan.  He means that just to dramatize his point, not because he thinks Jonathan did the eating.

He finds out to his horror that it was Jonathan. Well, an oath is an oath.  Saul is resolved that his son must die.  He’s saved, though, because the soldiers protest so much.  He gave us victory this day!  How can he be killed?  They got a point, and so Saul relents. Man, Saul can’t win.  When he goes to enforce a ticky-tack point (as here), he’s wrong. When he overlooks a minor point (as with Samuel last chapter), he’s wrong.  The Bible really runs down Saul. 

We’re then told that Saul had plenty of success against Israel’s enemies.  (Hey Samuel – don’t look now but this whole getting a king thing that you claim equals a rejection of God is actually working out pretty well, thank you very much. A more coherent political unit leads to a more effective military, and we’re seeing that going on).

CHAPTER 15

Samuel gives Saul a new assignment.  Back in the days of Moses the Amalek people treated us poorly.  Now it’s payback time.  Samuel wants some real vengeance – all to be put under the ban.  “Do not spare [the king], kill men, and women, children and infants, oxen and sheep, camels and donkeys.”  They are to be entirely slaughtered. Lovely stuff, Samuel.  You’re making it really easy for me to dislike you.

Quick point – why now?  It’s been over 400 years since Exodus. Why just now go after them?  My theory – because it’s only now that the Hebrew army is good enough.  Only now that they have a king.  But I’m sure the practical advantages of having a king will be forever lost on Samuel.  After all, priests and judges (like him) are sidelined, so having a king must be a rejection of God.  Case closed, screw any other practical matters.

Well, Saul does defeat them and slaughter them – but not enough.  He puts the people to the sword but captures the king and takes the good cattle.  Saul wants to offer it to God.  You can imagine Samuel’s reactions.  Good intentions are meaningless!  Just obey the letter of the law!  Saul tries to defend himself, but Samuel just comes down like a ton of bricks on the king. 

In fact, while I don’t think much of Samuel, the speech he gives is a doozy.  “Does the Lord delight in burnt offerings and sacrifices as much as in obedience to the Lord’s command?  Obedience is better than sacrifice, to listen, better than the fat of rams.  For a sin of divination is rebellion, and arrogance, the crime of idolatry.  Because you have rejected the word of the Lord, the Lord in turn has rejected you as king.”  That’s some powerful fire and brimstone talk there.  I imagine Samuel poking his elderly, accusing finger at Saul as he says it.  I imagine a special emphasis on “you” in that last bit – “the Lord in turn has rejected you as king.”  It’s one big fuck you to Saul. 

I don’t know what Samuel’s intent is when he gives this little tirade, but the effect is simple – he breaks Saul.  After this, Saul is a mentally fragile and often downright mentally ill king.  Up until now he’s been very successful.  His problems have been fairly minor ticky-tack stuff, but he’s hounded by the prophet (the same one who has always steadfastly opposed the principle of there being a king), but things will soon get worse for Saul. 

In fact, when Samuel goes to leave after his thunderous tirade, Saul grabs his cloak and it rips.  Samuel uses that as another angle on Saul. The ripped cloak represents that God has torn from Saul.  Oh, and then Samuel gets to the king Saul has let live and slices and dices, killing him personally. 

Samuel never saw Saul again after that, we’re told.  We’re also told Samuel grieves over Saul, but I wish Samuel would recognize his own role in hurting Saul.  Folks – so far Saul has been pretty effective in achieving his main goals.  Just a few procedural points could’ve gone been.  The Bible often complains about how the Israelis are a stiff-necked people – well Samuel is a stiff-necked prophet.  If Saul had the good fortune to become king when a more reasonable man had been judge, he’d have a much better time of things.

CHAPTER 16

Well, Samuel says God has broken from Saul, so now it’s time to fine a new king.  God tells Samuel to look with the family of Jesse of Bethlehem.  He has a cover story – he’s coming to offer a sacrifice.  One moment I found a bit intriguing – when Samuel comes to Bethlehem, the village elders come to Samuel trembling asking “Is your visit peaceful, O seer?”  This is just after Samuel chopped up a king and complained that Saul hadn’t been bloodthirsty enough.  Even Israelis are afraid of what a visit from Samuel might mean.

He comes in peace and goes to Jesse’s house.  He sees seven sons, but none are the right one.  Do you have any more?  Why yes – and here enters the most important figure since Moses: David.  He’s out tending sheep, he’s the youngest in the family.  But he’s called for and brought before Jesse – “He was ruddy, a youth with beautiful eyes and good looking” and Samuel figures this is the one. He anoints him, but in private.  Saul is still alive and any other anointed can be dangerous. My take?  This anointing story was later manufactured to increase David’s claim on the throne.  There would be contention from survivors from the House of Saul  - and that eventually leads to the divided kingdoms – but saying that David was first anointed by the prophet/judge/priest Samuel himself gives David a stronger claim to the throne.

We’re told that Saul is distraught. He suffers from depression apparently – “an evil spirit” the Bible says.  An evil spirit named Samuel.  All his complaining and denouncing of Saul finally broke him.  Samuel’s moral authority has convinced Saul that God – God himself – has abandoned him.  How can he now rule?  And again, let’s look over Saul’s crimes: he made an offering when Samuel was late, and didn’t kill every living thing – just 90% of the living things – with the Amalek. Oh, and his vow with killing Jonathan, but Samuel doesn’t seem to mind that.  Meanwhile, Saul has been the most successful military commander they’ve had since Joshua.  Like Samuel cares.  He’s always looked for an excuse to blast Saul, and he’s blasted Saul right out of his self-confidence, senses, and sanity.  Way to go, Samuel. Way to go.  

Click here to go to Chapters 17 to 22 of Samuel I. 

No comments:

Post a Comment