CHAPTER 9
Christ heals a paralytic, and notes that, “the Son of Man
has authority on earth to forgive sins.”
This is where we first start seeing Christ make statements about
himself, that he’s more than just some wise man or some healer. It’s a very vague statement (it comes from
Ezekiel) but we’ll keep getting more and more towards the question of his
divine nature as we go along. If you
think about it, for most people around him, Christ is just a wise healer who
himself seems to be a discipline of John the Baptist.
Christ calls a new apostle, Matthew the tax collector. That makes five apostles called. Fun fact: those are the only apostles we see
Christ call in the Gospel According to Matthew. The others will all get mentioned, but only five are called in
this gospel. The first four are called
because they were the first, and the book wants to show that his movement has
begun.
Matthew’s call is represented because it’s
controversial. After taking in the tax
collector, Christ sits with him and other tax collectors and sinners. I like how they’re paralleling tax
collectors and sinners, like they’re all the same thing. Anyhow, the Pharisees denounce Christ for hanging
out with a bad crowd. Christ is
nonplussed – sure I hang out with sinners.
They are the ones who need me.
Take that, Pharisees! (I’ll also
point out that more than a few of the most vocal Christians nowadays act just
like the Pharisees in this story and not like Christ).
The Pharisees have more problems with the Christ Gang. For example, they don’t fast. Why should we, Christ says, would wedding
guests fast when with the groom? I
won’t be here long, so people should celebrate while I’m here. Well, that is the first inkling that Christ
won’t live a long life in this realm.
Right after that, comes a bunch of healings. And it really is right after that. One thing I notice – oftentimes in Matthew
events are portrayed as happening immediately after one another. There is no lag time between them. Coming off the mountain after the Sermon on
the Mount, he’s approached by someone wanting to be cured last chapter. Here, Matthew tells us that as Christ is
explaining why he doesn’t fast, a woman approaches him to heal her dead
daughter. It’s a mini-Lazarus story,
one where it’s a little less clear if the woman actually died or not. There are mourners outside, but Christ
insists that the dead girl is just asleep, and commands her to awake. She was probably dead – but Jesus
specifically said she wasn’t, instead of taking credit for raising her from the
dead.
After that, Matthew notes that “as Jesus passed on from
there” – as he’s walking away from the non-dead daughter, he’s approached by
two blind men. Again, one event happens
IMMEDIATELY after the other. Christ
cures them and tells them to shut up about it, but they blab about it all over
town. Then Christ healed a bunch more
people.
CHAPTER 10
The first word in this chapter is “Then.” Again – Matthew wants to give us a sense
that all of these things are happening right after each other, it seems. “Then” doesn’t indicate much passage of
time.
Anyhow, apparently Christ now has a full compliment of
apostles – a dozen. (One for each of the
old tribes of Israel). Christ gives
them (and yes, they are named) marching orders. The first one: don’t go into pagan territory. That’s interesting, because his religion
will later flourish there and be rejected among the Jews. That’s a key difference between the religion
of Christ and the eventual Christian religion.
Christ tells them to cure people, help people – but don’t
accept any payment. “The laborer
deserves his keep.” Travel light and
stay with good people in each village you come to. Beware, though – people will try to persecute you.
The Gospel of Matthew is silent as to why people would want
to persecute them. It’s just taken as a
given. I assume it’s related to why
Christ tells people he cures to shut up about it. He doesn’t want the authorities to know who he really is if he
can help it. He’s coming to minister to
Jews – and he seems to have no problem with ordinary Jews – but he is also a
disruptive influence. And people in
power don’t like things that shake up the old status quo.
But Christ keeps on going about the coming persecution, and
it is a bleak image: “Brother will hand over brother to death, and the father
his child, children will rise up against parents and have them put to
death. You will be hated by all because
of my name, but whoever endures to the end will be saved.” Forget the destruction of the Temple in
Jerusalem for a second – this writer sounds like he’s survived the Nero-era
persecution of Christians. This bit
serves as a pep talk for people in the late first century AD to persevere
through all the problems they face. If
you think about it, these words make little sense in the context Matthew places
them, but they make sense for the readers later on. Why would Christ tell this to his apostles so early in his
ministry? Most of them, please note,
won’t have to worry about having their parents kill them or them killing their
parents. The pep talk goes further,
seemingly addressing any/all potential martyrs point blank: “And do not be
afraid of those who kill the body but cannot kill the soul; rather, be afraid
of the one who can destroy both soul and body.” Whatever happens, stay true to the religion – it will see you
through.
Oh, and if the rewards of keeping the faith isn’t enough,
Christ also applies the stick along with the heavenly carrot: “Whoever denies
me before others, I will deny before my heavenly Father.” So be courageous …or else!
Christ then makes one of his more remarkable statements –
one that flies directly and intentionally in the face of family values. He says he’s come to break up families. You must love me more than your parents or
more than you love your children. If
you don’t, then you are unworthy of Christ.
He comes off like a real fucking asshole here. Yeah, I know – you can love your family and God. But look at it in context. He’s saying he’s
come to break up families - he says, “I
have come to bring not peace but the sword” around here. Sure, nowadays for most people you pray to
Christ and you love your family. But at
the time he’s making this statement, Jesus is clear – you might have to make a
choice between me or your families – and fuck you if you pick your
families.
CHAPTER 11
Apparently John the Baptist isn’t dead yet. He sends messengers to Jesus – are you the
messiah? Christ gives one of his
typical indirect answers. He tells the
messengers from the Baptist – just report to John what you see: “the blind
regain their sight, the lame walk, lepers are cleansed, the deaf hear, the dead
are raised, and the poor have the good news proclaimed to them. And blessed is the one who take no offense
to me.” So yeah, he’s totally the
messiah, but he isn’t going to say it directly.
As the messengers left, Christ began speaking to a larger
crowd. Once again, Matthew makes clear that there is no time lapse between
these events – “As [the messengers] were going off” the next section
begins. Christ gives a speech to a
crowd where he praises the Baptist, even claiming John is Elijah.
Christ shifts gears, and begins to denounce a series of
towns. It’s not really clear why he’s
denouncing these towns, but I assume they rejected him and his message. This is frankly petty. It reminds me of the prophet Jeremiah
getting so caught up in the muck of pissing wars with his opponents that he
forgot to focus on the bigger picture here.
Christ tells the towns that they’ll have it worse than Sodom. Question/theory: I wonder what happened to
these towns (Chorazin, Bethsaida) during the Jewish uprising 30 years after
Christ. If they were destroyed (quite
possible) then this passage would be post facto using Christ to justify their
destruction. They were destroyed not
for rebelling against Rome, but rejecting God.
CHAPTER 12
Now the Pharisees are miffed that the Apostles ate grain on
the Sabbath. That’s against the rules,
but Christ has a nifty rejoinder: David did it with his army once. So get bent, Pharisees.
Oh, and then they try to get Christ on an even lamer
excuse. A man with a withered hand asks
Christ to heal it on the Sabbath. Now
the Pharisees leap – are you going to do this labor on the Lord’s Day? It’s not lawful to do this on the
Sabbath! Seriously, Pharisees? You’d rather someone suffer than let a minor
rule go? This gets to the heart of the
Jesus-Pharisee dispute. They are about
rigorously enforcing rules and injunctions.
Christ is about the feeling behind it.
Sure, love God – but love your fellow man, too. It’s about love, not edicts. Christ makes a different response to them,
though. Ever had a sheep fall in a hole
on the Sabbath? You tried to get it
out, right? Is a human hand worth less
than your sheep? So get bent, Pharisees.
We’re seeing the plot advance here, aren’t we? Now, it’s not just Christ doing his
deeds. Now it’s Christ have to defend
himself from critics; real asshole critics.
People start openly wondering if Christ is the chosen one – the “Son of
David” prophesized so long ago. The
Pharisees have their answer: no way. In
fact, they make the opposite claim.
Sure Christ can heel the sick – but his power comes from Satan, not God.
Jesus’s response is one of the best bits of logic in the
Bible. I’m in league with Satan, am
I? That’s dumb. Look, I’m casting demons out of people. I’m attacking demons. Why would Satan – head demon himself – look
to have one of his followers attack his other followers. That’s just dumb, Pharisees – oh, and get
bent. (I guess they could argue that
Christ is a sleeper cell for Satan playing the long game, but the TV show
Homeland is still 2,000 years away).
We get the official Jesus Christ quotation of George W.
Bush: “Whoever is not with me is against me, and however does not gather with
me scatters.” Bring it on,
Pharisees. And get bent. Then he calls them a “Brood of vipers.” Hey – John the Baptists called the Pharisees
that, didn’t he? (checks) Yup, word-for-word in Matthew 3:7. You can see there is still some Baptism
influence on Christ.
The Pharisees still haven’t gone off to get bent,
though. They demand proof from
Christ that he is The One. They demand a miracle. Christ tells them, in so many words, to get
bent. More precisely, he says, “An evil
and unfaithful generation seeks a sign.”
This, by the way, fits in perfectly with Christ’s words in Chapter 4
when he dealt with Satan. There, Christ
told Satan that you don’t test God (Matthew 4:7). Now the Pharisees are demanding a test, and that just ain’t
right.
The chapter ends with a story that really doesn’t fit well
with associations of Christianity – and it also is a sore sport for Catholic
veneration of the Virgin Mary. Christ
is told he has visitors – his mom and his brothers. OK, first – there is our first sign that Mary didn’t stay a Virgin. Maybe she was when Christ was born (no, I
don’t really think that, but let’s move on), but now she has other kids. Yeah,
that makes sense – but please note some Christian traditions insist that she
was always a Virgin, forever untainted by Original Sin. These traditions claim that Christ’s
brothers are either cousins, or half-brothers by Joseph from a previous
marriage (which ended in his first wife’s death). Man, some traditions are
really trying to hard to deny the obvious, aren’t they?
Anyhow, Christ is told his family is there to see him – and
he totally blows them off. “Who is my
mother?” Jesus says, “Who are my brothers?”
He points to his disciplines and says “Here are my mother and brother,
for whoever does the will of my heavenly Father is my brothers, and sister, and
mother.” Get bent, Virgin Mary.
Actually, if you think about it, that passage above
indicates that Christ doesn’t think his own relatives are following his
ways. That’s interesting. But more than that – he’s blowing off his
own kin! Boy, he wasn’t kidding when he
said he was coming to bring not peace, but the sword. There is a definite militant edge to Christ throughout this
Gospel. Early on, his birth is enough
to cause Herod to slice up babies out of fear; Christ’s Sermon on the Mount
sets up impossibly high standards for ethical conduct, and here he is
disdainful to his own mom.
Speaking of that mom – the Virgin Mary will later becomes a
key figure in the Catholic Church.
Going back to medieval times, people pray to the Virgin Mary, that she
might intervene with her son on their behalf.
(Because what boy would refuse his mother?) Well, Jesus would refuse his
mother, that’s who. I’m sure there are
other points in the Gospels that will present a different view of the
Mary-Jesus relationship – but this is in the Bible, too.
Really, throughout Matthew so far Christ has had an
anti-family attitude. Love him more
than you love your kids and parents. Be
willing to break with your family. Now
this. Whoever wrote the Gospel of
Matthew, this author probably had his family reject him over his newfound
religion.
CHAPTER 13
Weighing in at 58 verses, this is the longest chapter in
Matthew – until the Passion.
It’s primarily a bunch of teachings of Christ – and it’s a
different type of teachings than the Sermon on the Mount. Instead of directly saying what he means, he
gives a bunch of parables. Jesus does
love his parables. At one point in this
chapter his disciples ask him why he speaks in parables, and Christ tells them
that not everyone has yet been granted access to the mysteries of the kingdom
of heaven. So Christ speaks indirectly,
to give them a sense of it, but not really get too detailed. Oh, and he doesn’t
say this, but it’s also a nice way to frustrate and those Pharisees who are
constantly out to trap him.
Most of Christ’s parables are about the kingdom of heaven,
and how it will grow. It’s like grain
that is scattered on various types of soil.
Some soil might see it sprout really well, but it will wither at the
first bad time. So Christ needs his
ideas to be planted in deep soil, soil that will allow deep roots that will
nourish the theology and allow it go grow.
If, in the meantime, that means some bad influences will
enter his movement, Christ will accept that.
At least that’s the take I get from the next parable, about weeds among
the wheat. A mean guy planted weeds in
his neighbor’s wheat field, but the guy decides to let the weeds grow.
Uprooting them will uproot some wheat.
He’ll wait until the harvest and then uproot the weeds first and burn
them in the fire. Then he’ll collect
the wheat. Christ later explains that
when the Day of the Lord comes, the non-believers will be the weeds and they’ll
be burnt, like the weeds. Hey! I think we just our first sense of the
Christian hell – a place where sinners go to burn.
Christ makes a factual error in his next parable. He says the mustard seed is the smallest of
seeds, but grows one of the biggest of plants.
That’s what he wants his movement to be like. Problem: there are smaller seeds than the mustard seed. There just are – this isn’t arguable. That hasn’t stopped an entire cottage
industry of Biblical literalists to try to explain their way out of this
one. Folks, sometimes you got to let
the little things go. Moving on, this
mustard seed analogy does a great job analogizing what will actually happen.
The Jesus movement does start small – but boy oh boy does it ever grow big
eventually!
Christ then gives a bunch more parables. Most are short and they are too many to
really recount. The main thing is they
are all nature allegories. They are
parables designed to work for farmers.
That makes sense – almost all people back then farm. This would make sense to them. We’re a bit removed from the agricultural
focus on the early Christian environment, so it does have quite the same
resonance.
Oh, and periodically the apostles ask Christ what his
parables mean. He explains without any
anger – but I do believe he’ll get sick of them later on not being able to
figure this out on their own.
Oh, and I almost forgot – the chapter ends with one of my
favorite scenes in the Bible so far.
Jesus goes back to his hometown of Nazareth to preach before the people
he grew up with. He speaks at the
synagogue and they are amazed – and not necessarily in a good way. They exclaim,
“Is he not the carpenter’s son? Is not
his mother named Mary and his brothers James, Joseph, Simon, and Judas? Are not his sisters all with us? Where did
this man get all this?” They’re
offended! Jesus has to leave in anger,
declaring, “A prophet is not without honor except in his native place and in
his own house.” He didn’t achieve any
miracles there, they lack faith in him.
This is wonderful for several reasons. First, this story is great evidence for the
historical Jesus. Sometimes people will
wonder if Jesus really lived, and yeah, the evidence is pretty strong (too much
written about him too soon after his death to make his life total
fiction). But think about this – if
Christ really was fiction; if he was a fabrication made by St. Paul and writers
like Matthew – why oh why would you ever invent this story? Wouldn’t you rather have the people who grew
up around him the most likely to see him as a special one? “Oh, we knew him when he was little and even
then, you could tell…” Yeah, that’s how
you handle it if he’s fiction.
But look at it from the perspective of the townspeople. Look at their words. They could just as easily say, “Is he not
the carpenter’s son? Didn’t he wet his
pants in the second grade and get admonished by his kindergarten teacher for
eating paste?” Man, how can they see
him as the Messiah? - They knew him
when he was a snot-nosed twit, just like everyone else. Familiarity doesn’t necessarily breed
contempt, but it sure as hell doesn’t breed awe and reverence. How can you think someone is the Messiah
when you’ve heard him belch?
It’s just a wonderfully realistic and human story. And Christ’s response is perfect. He’s annoyed, he’s embarrassed – he wants
out of this two-bit cow-town. A prophet
has no honor in his own house. That
reminds me of a line by Gen. Schwartzkopf after Desert Storm. He recalled being a top general at a
military base. He gives an order and
60,000 move just as he tells them to – then he goes home and he can’t get his
kids to take out the trash. God, that’s
a wonderful end to the story of Christ in Nazareth.
Anyhow, apparently Christ now has a full compliment of apostles – a dozen. (One for each of the old tribes of Israel).
ReplyDeletePersonally, I really like the listing of the apostles in Matthew's Gospel; more so than those found in the other Gospels. Matthew 10:2-4 (NIV):
These are the names of the twelve apostles: first, Simon (who is called Peter) and his brother Andrew; James son of Zebedee, and his brother John; Philip and Bartholomew; Thomas and Matthew the tax collector; James son of Alphaeus, and Thaddaeus; Simon the Zealot and Judas Iscariot, who betrayed him."
You have Simon the Zealot (sometimes mistranslated as Simon the Canaanite). The Zealots were a political movement so militant against the occupying forces of Jerusalem that they advocated violence against the Romans, and the Roman's Jewish collaborators.
And you have Matthew. A Jew who worked as a tax collector for the Romans.
Man, can you imagine what it must have been like when Simon the Zealot and Matthew the tax collector talked politics? Better not sit those two together at the Last Supper!
Yet there they are, two of the twelve, right on into the Book of Acts (1:13-14 NIV):
"When they arrived, they went upstairs to the room where they were staying. Those present were Peter, John, James and Andrew; Philip and Thomas, Bartholomew and Matthew; James son of Alphaeus and Simon the Zealot, and Judas son of James. They all joined together constantly in prayer, along with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brothers."
Moral of the story: you can be joined together in faith and constant prayer with people whose political beliefs are the polar opposite of yours.
Anyhow, Christ is told his family is there to see him – and he totally blows them off. “Who is my mother?” Jesus says, “Who are my brothers?” He points to his disciplines and says “Here are my mother and brother, for whoever does the will of my heavenly Father is my brothers, and sister, and mother.” Get bent, Virgin Mary.
Eh, maybe. It's also possible that Jesus was just using the occasion as a teaching point. "Hey, Jesus, look! You're mother, brothers, and sisters are here!" To which Jesus responds "You know, if you do God's will, you're as much family to me as they are." Looked at in that way, Jesus is not so much dissing his relatives as he is letting his followers know that being related by blood offers no special privileges in the Kingdom. Incidentally, this is also Jesus pointing the way for non-Jews to enter the kingdom: if being Jesus' actual sibling or mother is of no special status, why would there be any special status conferred to anyone simply because they are, like Jesus, a descendant of Israel? Anyway, my main point is that an alternate reading is possible.
Re: your comments on the end of Chapter 13: agree with all your points. Very well stated by you.
Peace and Love,
Jimbo
The Gospel of Matthew is silent as to why people would want to persecute them.
ReplyDeleteBecause they don't fast? Because they spend most of their time with sinners? The Gospel of Matthew is quite vehement in setting the Pharisees in contrast to the Christians. Yet they believe many similar things, and direct their appeal towards the common folk. Quite possibly the key difference between them is that the Pharisees are more attached to the Temple and its place in Jewish society, while the Christians are willing to let go of this physical structure, and focus on the community of believers' spiritual life. There's a sort of continuum in that respect from the Sadducees, through the Pharisees and then the Christians — a decreasing attachment to the temple.
As for the anti-family streak in Matthew, remember that this gospel is written for an audience of Jewish converts. Many of them would have been harassed and maybe outright disowned by their families for joining a cult. It would have been just as bad as worshipping Baal or the roman gods.
ReplyDeleteSo Matthew shows the earliest disciples leaving their family behind to follow Jesus, as an example to his readers.