CHAPTER 18
Welcome everyone to the …. Leviticus Drinking Game. Every time God says “I am the LORD” or “I am the LORD your God”
or something like that – take a shot.
Beginning with this chapter, he starts saying it frequently. It’s the Almighty Microphone Drop – he says it
often at the end of paragraphs. Say it, drop the mike, and walk off the stage before anyone can respond.
This chapter is all above sex – particularly, what to
avoid. Let’s see – incest, that’s
out. And then it goes into all of the
combinations you’re not supposed to get into.
Cousin-on-cousin action is cool with the Lord. Well, that’s good news for the patriarchs who kept marrying their
own cousin. But marrying your
sibling? That’s out. Bummer for Abraham and Sarah, who were
half-brother/half-sister. And by the
language, it looks like half-siblings are also verboten. Good thing Abraham came before. I guess we’ll grandfather in the grandfather
of the Hebrew.
Oh, and it’s also a bad idea to sacrifice your children to
Molech. Yeah, I gotta agree with that
one. Sacrificing your kids to false
gods does sound like a bad idea.
Then things take a turn for the ugly and the modern
politicized. Here’s where God tells us
“You shall not lie with a male as with a woman, such a thing is an
abomination.” Yup, it’s Leviticus 18:22
that denounces gay sex. Immediately
after, it comes out against bestiality.
That sums up the key sex laws, but then comes the
justification for these things.
Apparently the people of Canaan do all of these things and God ain’t
happy with that. “And so the land has
become defiled, and I have punished it for its wickedness and the land has
vomited out its inhabitants.” Few
things there – isn’t God jumping the gun with the verb tense? People will be driven out later, not
earlier. Second, that’s some jarring
imagery – “vomited out its inhabitants.”
As a non-believer who supports gay rights, this is a
depressing part of the Bible. I know
the standard retort – there are a lot of Bible laws that are ignored. (We have a doozy next chapter, in
fact) and people always pick-and-choose which ones define their religion. This is very true. Then again, while the Bible doesn’t make a mania of denouncing
gay rights, when the subject comes up, it isn’t just another thing. It’s always associated with something
especially repugnant. It’s flatly called
abhorrent here, and it one of the justifications for depriving the Canaanites
of Canaan. It’s a justification for the
wholesale destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah.
(There’s more to it than that, though.
They were going to rape angels of the Lord, and weren’t going to treat
travelers well). Later on it’s also
used to justify war on the tribe of Benjamin.
I don’t like this aspect of the Bible, but going strictly off the Bible,
the anti-gay edicts are a bit more than, say, mixing fabrics. That said, care for the poor is a far bigger
theme throughout. As I said, anti-gay
rhetoric is pretty damn infrequent in the Bible.
CHAPTER 19
OK, if you’re doing the Leviticus Drinking Game, you can get
put in a real good mood by this chapter. I count about 10 shots in the
course of its 37 verses.
This is more laws, and much of it is rehashing of all laws
we’ve already seen. It does contain one
great bit on justice: “You shall not act dishonestly in rendering
judgment. Show neither partiality to
the weak nor deference to the mighty, but judge your neighbor justly. You shall not go about spreading slander
among your people, nor shall you stand by idly when your neighbor’s life is at
stake. I am the LORD” (drink!). That sounds like a good plan for how judges
should act.
If the last chapter had a part that Christian conservatives
love to bring up, this chapter gives some meat for religious lefties. There is a strong concern with social
justice. Don’t use up all your
vineyards and fields – leave some behind for the poor and the alien. So you’re supposed to let the poor pick from
your fields. Don’t exploit your
neighbor. That’s sound advice, but then
it comes how you define exploit. Plenty
of legal behavior is exploitation, and this chapter has none of it.
It’s part of a larger trend toward tolerance toward the
meek. For example, we’re told words
that I assume all agree with – be nice to the blind, the deaf, and to your
neighbor. “Reprove your neighbor
openly” so that you don’t have bad blood develop silently.
Oh, and then comes one of the strangest laws in the Bible:
“do not put on a garment woven with different kinds of thread.” Why would God care? Well, he does. It's become the official passage for people who oppose religious fundamentalism. OK, so you think homosexuals are evil because of a passage in the Bible - well, what are your thoughts on mixing fabric? After all, you don't here Pat Robertson & friends worry about this one too much.
Actually, the fabric thing is part of a longer stretch that goes like this: “do
not breed ay of your domestic animals with others of a different species; do
not sow a field of yours with two different kinds of seed, and do not put on a
garment woven with two different kinds of threads.” It’s part of an overall
ethos of not crossing streams, not mixing and matching. It starts off reasonably enough, I guess,
but it’s like God is so caught up in this train of thought that he forgets to
get off at the right stop. He just gets
a little nutty with things. Lucky for
us that he stopped before telling us to keep our chocolate and peanut butter
separate.
Oh, and here’s where we see the origins of Orthodox Jewish
facial hair. We’re told not to clip
your hair at the temples and not to spoil the edges of your beard. For that matter, don’t lacerate your bodies
for the dead and no tattoos.
Guns’n’Roses wouldn’t have made it as traditional Jews.
It ends with some good general advice – respect your elders,
be good to aliens amongst you – ‘for you too were once aliens in the land of
Egypt”, don’t cheat anyone, and oh yeah – don’t turn your daughters into
prostitutes. Nice of God to point out
that last one, but it means people actually did that.
For those playing the Leviticus Drinking Game, the end of
chapter 19 is when you’ll be drinking fastest and furiousiest. You get six “I am the LORD”s in the last
eight verses – including three in a row at one point. It’s mike drop after mike drop.
CHAPTER 20
Now that we’ve been given a bunch of rules, it’s time to
spell out the penalties. It might
actually work better if they’d given both at the same time – save on repetition
– but no matter.
This is a combination of sensible stuff (if you sacrifice
children to Molech, you’ll be killed) with some ghastly ones. The most famously and politicized one is gay
sex is a capital offense. Yeah, that
sure sounds bad to modern ears. But
that’s not the most horrific thing in here.
20:9: “Anyone who curses father or mother shall be put to death.” Wow.
Now, the footnotes say this doesn’t mean, “Dad, go fuck yourself” but
something more like taking a blood oath to have your father cursed forever. I sure hope that footnote is right, because
that’s ghastly. Even if the footnote is correct, that's still ghastly. It's hard to believe anyone ever really practiced this. Combining threads gets the mocking of people who oppose being too fundamentalist in their actions, but this is the one part that no one really ever tries acting on (Marvin Gaye Sr. not withstanding).
Plenty of death penalties here. It’s either that or cutting
them off from the community. Remember – there are no prisons to a wandering
band in the desert. A man who makes
like Abraham and marries his sister is to be cut off from the people. If you have sex with a woman during her
period, you’re to be cut off from the community. Well, that’s harsh.
Oh, and there’s a key bit of English history as well. Really.
20:21: If a man takes his brother’s wife, it is severe defilement and he
has disgraced his brother; they shall be childless.” Catherine of Aragon married Arthur, the firstborn son of King
Henry VII. Then Arthur died, and she
married his only other son – who became Henry VIII. They didn’t have any kids and Henry VIII uses this to try to get
an annulment. Hey, the Bible says we’ll
be cursed of having no kids, and we haven’t – clearly God doesn’t approve so
this can’t be any holy matrimony! Now,
my memory is shaky but there is reason to think Arthur never consummated his
marriage, and of course Henry VIII had his own reasons for a divorce that had
nothing to do with religion, but that’s the background.
There is some very striking language toward the end: “Be
careful to observe all my statutes and all my decrees; otherwise the land where
I am bringing you to dwell will vomit you out.” Vomit. That’s a hell of a
verb to use; very graphic. My theory:
this is a bit put in by the Redactor, the editor who gathered the four main
sources and created the modern Torah as we know it. My hunch is that’s the case because, of course, they did lose
their Promised Land. And this is the
official religious reasons why – we didn’t follow God’s laws and so we’ve been
punished.
(looks it up). Nope. Richard Elliot Friedman lists it as Source
P. Shows what I know – they always had
some of this punishment talk in there from the beginning.
Also, God makes clear that people aren’t to adopt the
customs of those around them. This is
actually really crucial. This is a big
part of the reason why Jews still survive as a separate independent
people. They have their own customs,
and traditions. Yes, religion is a huge
part of it – central even – but it’s more than just that. It’s day-to-day practices that help
reinforce this sense of separate identity.
There’s not much drinking in the Leviticus Drinking Game
here. It gives you a chance to recover
from the deluges at the end of Chapter 19.
CHAPTER 21
Now we get into priest rules. Much is what you’d expect.
It’s a little too wordy for its own good. An early part says he can’t marry a prostitute or someone
divorced – then later is say he must marry a virgin (then repeats the bit about
no divorced or prostitutes). If the
priest’s daughter becomes a prostitute, to the fire with her. Lots of prostitute talk here, isn’t
there?
Oh, and there is no equal rights for the handicapped in the
priesthood. The following sons of Aaron
need not apply: deaf, blind, lame, split lip, too long a limb, broken arm or
leg, hunchback, dwarf, “has a growth in the eye” (?), skin disease, and last by
not least – no crushed testicles. It
takes balls to be a priest.
Well, there are some actual physical duties of being a
priest, so the above might get in the way. Yeah, but that’s not why they’re
banned. If you look bad or clearly
flawed, well, that just looks bad for the whole presentation. They’re the ones closest to good – so how
come they’re messed up?
CHAPTER 22
It’s more stuff on priests, and it’s largely a rehashing of
what’s come before. Here’s one bit – no
priest “who suffers from a genital discharge may eat of the sacred offerings
until he again becomes clean.” Let’s
see, if you sleep with your wife you’re unclean until nightfall. Other “discharges” take a week to cleanse,
so there’s definitely making sure people that jerk off aren’t allowed in. And, of course, priests aren’t supposed to
sleep around.
At the end, the Lord comes back with a bunch of mike drops -
-three “I am the LORD”s to drink to in the last four verses.
Click here for the end of Leviticus.
Click here for the end of Leviticus.
You noticed this regarding Lev 15:
ReplyDeleteBy the way – assuming I’m right about the first half of the chapter being about masturbation – at no point does the Bible consider the possibility of female masturbation.
So I'm kinda disappointed that you didn't notice that Lev 18:22 -
"No man is to have sexual relations with another man; God hates that."
speaks only to male homesexuality, and not to lesbianism. Personally, I think that this is an important point towards understanding this verse; as I think these two verses are very much related.
I suspect that the reason why male homesexuality would be expressly forbidden in the Bible while lesbianism would have no penalty, is for the same reason that male masturbation would a punishable offense and female masturbation would not; as you put it:
So there’s nothing about jerking off making you go blind, but there is still a penalty. This fits in with be fruitful and multiply. Man, you’re wasting your seed!
It all boils down to seed wasting.
With gay male sex, you've got males spilling seed in pairs; that's a whole lot of sperm being used to not make babies; and that, in turn, would explain why it would be a punishable offense.
Meanwhile, there's no mention of two women having sex together being a punishable offense. If we follow through on this line of thinking, then that could be explained using the same reasoning why female masturbation was not a punishable offense: there's no life-giving seed being spilled.
Yes, obviously, you could argue that lesbianism takes a couple of eggs off the baby-making market; but it could also be argued that a female (heterosexual or otherwise) has an innate desire for motherhood; and that innate desire will eventually lead her towards having children. Consider, for example, this article:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1340012/Lesbian-couples-single-women-rush-IVF.html
regarding the increase in IVF treatment among lesbian couples in recent years in the UK. While it's just a single datapoint, hopefully the article helps to illustrate my point; which is that being involved in a lesbian relationship does not in and of itself negate a woman's desire to give birth to a child, thus helping to grow the population (and, human nature being human nature, what's true of people now is extremely likely to have been true of their ancestors; it's only the technology that changes).
Anyway, speaking as a non-scholar (I figure this was as good a place as any to state that fact) I think it's telling that the key verse against same-sex intercourse speaks only to male-with-male sex, and comes just a few chapters after the section that punishes male but not female masturbation; and I think the reason why is clear (especially since you also came to the same basic conclusion independently): because you can't grow a nation with men spilling their seed; either alone or in pairs.
Peace and Love,
Jimbo
If I remember my biblical history properly, the reason for all the prostitute discussion is that temple prostitution was common back in those days. So it was an important part of the Hebrew culture that they didn't allow such things.
ReplyDelete